Working in a coffee shop—earning money while enjoying unlimited coffee—is one of the reasons many young people choose to become baristas. Luckin Coffee also once attracted numerous enthusiasts to join with its relaxed employee drink benefits: once they met the required working hours, they could enjoy drinks and even freely mix their own concoctions. Recently, however, this benefit has been gradually tightened: employees who do not make drinks according to the recipe receive surveillance warnings, and stores prohibit free mixing in order to control waste, leaving frontline staff grumbling. At the same time, a series of price increases and cost-cutting measures Luckin has implemented since last year's financial report was released have also sparked controversy among both consumers and employees. This article will sort out the ins and outs of the changes to Luckin's employee drink benefits, as well as the backlash against the cost-cutting and efficiency-boosting strategy behind them. [more…]

In the coffee and tea beverage industry, "employee drinks" have long been one of the key perks attracting young people to join the trade. Recently, however, multiple employees of Heytea and Luckin Coffee have alleged that their stores have canceled or scaled back this benefit, citing declining performance. An investigation found that employee perks at directly operated stores are still intact for now, but workers at franchise and joint-venture stores are frequently seeing their benefits shrink. The employee drink perk promised by the brands is actually borne by franchisees, and some franchisees, in order to cut costs, either cancel the benefit or strictly tighten the conditions for using it. This phenomenon has drawn industry attention: when the pressure of store operations is passed down to frontline employees, who should foot the bill for employee benefits? Front Street Coffee keeps a close eye on developments in the coffee industry, and this article takes you through the ins and outs of this battle over benefits. [more…]

Recently, a Mixue Bingcheng store in Shenyang made trending news after a dispute broke out between a staff member and a customer. According to a report by Xiaoxiang Morning Herald, a woman ordered three drinks in advance but was delayed by more than ten minutes after going to the wrong store. When she arrived, she was unable to get the drinks that had already been made, and then got into an argument with a male employee, who even made harsh remarks such as "Eat it if you want, if not, get out." After the incident video was exposed, it sparked widespread discussion among netizens. Some criticized the employee's poor service attitude, while others pointed out that freshly made iced drinks have their own reasonable preparation requirements, but more people believed that the responsibility of both sides needed to be judged based on the full sequence of events. At present, the employee involved has been fired by the store and has compensated the customer. [more…]

Recently, a video of an employee preparing drinks at a Mixue Bingcheng store in Xi'an circulated on social media, sparking widespread discussion. In the video, the employee holds two takeout cups in one hand, adds ice cubes, and then directly places them under a water bucket labeled "direct drinking water" to fill them. The water splashes onto the ice cubes, and some liquid runs down the employee's arm toward the ice cart below. The door of the ice cart cabinet remains open the whole time, prompting onlookers to say the ice has been contaminated. After the incident gained traction, the store involved responded that the company is handling the matter urgently and that the employee has been dismissed. This controversy has once again pushed Mixue Bingcheng's food safety issues into the spotlight, with many consumers calling on the brand to strengthen store operating standards. [more…]

Luckin Coffee has always been quick to roll out new products, and many fans keep a close eye on the "Luckin new releases" tag to get first-hand news. However, recently some netizens noticed under that tag a drink called "Luckin Pistachio Coconut Water," which looked fresh and tempting, yet was nowhere to be found on the store menu. It turned out that this drink was actually a homemade concoction whipped up by Luckin employees themselves, but it had been posted on social media under the "Luckin new releases" tag. Similar situations have occurred repeatedly, often racking up thousands of likes, with fans eagerly asking in the comments how to buy it—only to find that none of them could actually purchase it in stores or on the ordering platform. Consumers, full of anticipation, go to the store only to have cold water thrown on their hopes, and dissatisfaction follows. At the same time, employees also face the risk of violating rules; under strict production regulations and monitoring inspections, making private drinks could land both themselves and their stores in trouble. [more…]

Recently, a video of a Mixue Bingcheng employee crying while making drinks due to a flood of orders spread rapidly online, drawing widespread attention. The incident occurred in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, where a delivery rider picking up an order found that only one employee was handling order labels several meters long alone, emotionally breaking down yet still not stopping work. After the video was posted, many netizens expressed sympathy for the plight of tea beverage workers, while some pointed out the contradiction between delivery platforms' price wars driving surging sales and staffing not increasing. Mixue Bingcheng later responded that the employee was the store manager and that the crying was due to family conflicts rather than work pressure. Behind the incident, it reflects the operational difficulties and employee mental health issues in the tea beverage industry under low-price competition. [more…]

Recently, a post about a Starbucks employee accidentally spilling coffee on a customer sparked heated discussion on social media. The poster said that while picking up their order, their newly bought white coat was stained by coffee knocked over by the employee, and the employee only apologized in a low voice before continuing to work, while the store manager said compensation was not possible and only suggested trying to clean it with alcohol. As the incident continued to escalate, many Starbucks employees revealed in the comments that company training already requires drinks to be placed on the counter for customers to pick up themselves, but in unexpected situations, staff should immediately apologize and take responsibility. As of press time, the person involved had still not received a formal reply from Starbucks. [more…]

A controversy sparked by a cup of milk tea unexpectedly brought benefits to a competitor. Recently, an employee at a Lelecha store, when responding to a customer's inquiry about non-dairy creamer, inadvertently used Guming as a comparison, which caused customer dissatisfaction and was exposed on social media. Lelecha officially apologized quickly and launched a compensation plan, one part of which offered a 50% discount to Guming employees, prompting netizens to say Guming "won without doing anything." How did this customer complaint turn into a positive case of brand PR? From rapid response to substantive compensation, Lelecha's handling won recognition from many consumers and was even praised as "something other brands could study for a hundred years." This article will recount the entire incident and analyze the PR wisdom and industry lessons within it. [more…]

Recently, a violent conflict between a customer and an employee broke out at a store of the local Malaysian coffee chain Zus Coffee in Kuala Lumpur. A video of about 15 seconds spread rapidly online, showing both sides throwing drinks and objects at each other, with the scene briefly spiraling out of control. The incident sparked various speculations among netizens about the cause of the conflict and also triggered discussions about how brands should protect frontline employees. After the incident, Zus Coffee issued two consecutive statements denying that the employee involved had been fired and saying it had referred the matter to the police. This article will sort through the course of the incident, the reactions of all parties, and the brand's official response. [more…]

Recently, a customer discovered after picking up their order at Starbucks that they had been given the wrong drink. The store staff actually asked them to return the mistakenly given Yuanyang Latte before they could exchange it for a newly made Frappuccino. This handling method quickly sparked heated discussion online. Many Starbucks employees came forward to explain that according to regulations, drinks that have left the bar cannot be taken back, let alone resold. The staff member involved was acting in violation of the rules. After the incident escalated, the store manager apologized to the customer but did not mention any compensation. As coffee enthusiasts, we pay attention to service standards and the consumer experience, and we also recommend the consistent quality of Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, a video of a Chagee employee handling tea drinks with bare hands spread rapidly online, sparking widespread public concern about food safety issues at chain tea beverage brands. In the video, the employee, without wearing gloves, directly grabbed ice cubes and lemons and reached into a shaker cup to pound and stir the drink, prompting netizens to exclaim they were "disgusted." Although the poster explained that the footage was filmed after closing hours using damaged inventory to mimic the "Indian milk tea" meme, public opinion did not subside. Subsequently, netizens discovered that employees of several other brands, including Luckin Coffee, Yidian Dian, and Goodme, had also posted similar meme videos. Chagee officially issued an urgent investigation notice, imposing an indefinite suspension and rectification on the store involved, dismissing the employee involved, and demoting managerial personnel. This article will review the sequence of events and responses from all parties, and explore the boundary between food safety and entertainment-oriented marketing in the tea beverage industry. [more…]

Recently, a video about finding an employee badge in a Luckin Coffee drink has drawn attention on social media. According to a netizen's post, while drinking a Luckin cold beverage, they discovered an employee badge with a staff name printed on it at the bottom of the cup. After media verification, the store involved admitted that an employee had indeed lost a badge, speculating that a loose pin caused it to fall into the drink. At the same time, posts on social media about foreign objects such as flying insects, raw material packaging boxes, and equipment parts appearing in Luckin drinks are not uncommon, and stores mostly compensate consumers with refunds plus coupons, triggering some customers' doubts about the brand's attitude in handling such matters. Some consumers have shared their experiences of defending their rights, ultimately reaching a satisfactory solution through negotiation. This series of incidents has once again pushed the food safety and after-sales handling of chain coffee brands into the focus of public opinion. [more…]

Recently, a customer posted a video on social media claiming they found a piece of white plastic foreign object in a drink purchased from Mixue Ice Cream & Tea. Unexpectedly, the comment section did not fill with criticism of the merchant. Instead, many Mixue employees left comments pleading with the customer to return this part, which they jokingly called a "veteran employee." It turns out this piece of plastic was the star tip nozzle accessory for the ice cream machine's dispenser outlet. Once lost, it not only affects the shape of the product but also means the staff member may have to pay compensation. Behind this incident lies not only the detailed challenges of equipment management in food service stores but also consumers' ongoing concern about food safety. [more…]

As the weather warms up, Luckin's iced drink sales are climbing, and the old problem of "too much ice" has once again sparked discussion. Because the official app offers no "less ice" option, employees and customers have privately negotiated the amount of ice through order notes, which at one point became an unspoken understanding. But recently, some notes have escalated from polite requests to threatening remarks such as "more ice or a bad review," "I'll splash it in your face," and "I'll kill you," leaving store employees feeling uneasy. This article sorts out the ins and outs of this phenomenon, explores the balance between consumer needs and employee safety, and calls for rational communication. [more…]

Recently, a video of a CoCo milk tea shop employee eating watermelon while cutting it has sparked heated discussion online. The video shows the employee, while preparing ingredients for a watermelon drink, not wearing gloves, cutting off a piece and eating it directly, then continuing to process the remaining fruit. This behavior might be harmless in a home kitchen, but in a restaurant back kitchen it touches a sensitive nerve regarding food safety and operating standards. Some netizens believe that an employee daring to eat the ingredient actually proves the food is fresh, but more people are concerned about saliva contamination, food waste, and the lack of corporate rules. The manager of the shop involved responded that they are verifying the matter, but had not received authorization from headquarters to publicly announce the handling result. The incident once again pushes the hygiene management and employee operating habits of restaurant back kitchens into the focus of public opinion. [more…]

On the first day back to work, a customer ordered a large Reserve iced Americano at Starbucks, which should have contained four shots of espresso, but only received three. After the staff admitted the mistake, they added an extra shot without asking and returned the drink. This was not an isolated incident; previously, the same store had also missed caramel drizzle on a Caramel Macchiato. Consumers began to question whether Starbucks was cutting corners in its offerings, while employees explained that Reserve bean hoppers typically extract two shots at a time, so normally two extractions would yield four shots, and the shortage was likely due to a misremembered recipe. Meanwhile, on social media, there were continuous complaints about Starbucks lattes tasting weak, hot drinks not filling the cup, and missing hazelnut pieces on whipped cream, along with occasional issues with service attitude. Some employees revealed that after accelerated store expansion, training time was compressed, staff quality varied, and quality control became unstable. Front Street Coffee always pays attention to quality and service trends in the coffee industry. [more…]

Recently, a customer at a Luckin Coffee store saw a notice posted on the counter that read, "A staff member has a fever, so orders are being prepared more slowly. Please don't rush us." The customer snapped a photo, which quickly sparked widespread discussion online. Some praised the employees' dedication, while others worried that preparing drinks while sick posed food safety risks. However, Luckin employees have expressed their helplessness: it's not that they don't want to rest, but that stores are understaffed and there is no one to cover their shifts, making sick leave almost a luxury. This phenomenon is not unique to Luckin; workers in the tea and coffee industries have all resonated with it. This article will recount the incident and explore the institutional and practical contradictions behind working while sick. [more…]

Recently, Chayan Yuese has frequently appeared on Weibo's trending topics due to employee salary issues, sparking widespread attention. The incident began when employees complained about low wages and reduced working hours, which subsequently led to a heated argument between company executives and employees in a group chat, even prompting founder Lü Liang to personally apologize. According to revelations, Chayan Yuese has internal problems such as chaotic management and severe classism, with the number of employees leaving the group once reaching over two hundred. Although the official response stated that the number of people leaving the group was about 87 and explained that the salary adjustment was a special arrangement during the pandemic, netizens did not buy it. As a leading brand in new Chinese-style tea drinks, this turmoil at Chayan Yuese has not only exposed internal conflicts but also triggered profound public reflection on brand management and corporate culture. [more…]

Luckin Coffee recently launched an internal AI-based store scheduling system that collects historical business data to predict the daily staffing and working hours needed at each store, attempting to allocate existing manpower more efficiently. However, this seemingly scientific automatic scheduling has drawn widespread complaints from many Luckin employees. They point out that the system uses hourly cup output as its core reference only, completely ignoring a large amount of invisible work such as cleaning, ingredient preparation, and expiration checks, leaving baristas working alone exhausted and even forced to work unpaid overtime just to finish up. Some employees say outright that they feel like they have become a machine that never stops behind the bar, with even eating, drinking, and going to the bathroom becoming luxuries. This efficiency reform driven by algorithms is pushing frontline baristas to the brink of physical and mental exhaustion. [more…]

Recently, a netizen shared on social media their experience ordering at Luckin: a single cup of coffee was repeatedly remade by the staff four times before they finally got it. From getting the hot/iced order wrong, to rinsing the cup with tap water, to being stopped by a colleague when about to add ice and milk, the whole process left many onlookers exclaiming how absurd it was. The incident also sparked heated discussion about Luckin's employee training, operating standards, and food safety. What exactly happened? Was the customer's complaint reasonable? And what problems did the store's operations expose? Let's take a look. [more…]